Resisting Austerity - Mike Vallance,
Edinburgh Coalition Against Poverty, Autonomous Centre
Edinburgh (ACE)
ACE, which has its office in Montgomery Street,
developed from the Edinburgh Unemployed Workers Centre (EUWC) in Broughton
Street. The EUWC was closed down by the city council in 1997. ACE is a centre
for benefits claimants, low paid, part time and temporary workers. ACE handles
cases by representing people when dealing with the authorities.
This involves fighting individual claims. We
also support collective struggles, in particular against welfare abuses. We see
this as just part of the international struggle against capital.
Since 1997 there has been a weekly drop-in at
ACE every Tuesday. The main problem we deal with is benefits, but we also
handle debt and housing problems. Many of the cases now involve benefit
sanctions, particularly for the unemployed and disabled. There has been a huge
increase in our caseload. The drop-in is officially from 12.00 - 15.00, but
sometimes we have to remain open until 17.00 or 18.00, such is the increase in
numbers. The horror is stepping up.
Workfare leads to community work placement for
up to 6months. This involves 30 hours work a week for no extra money. Even
MAXIMOS (the replacement for ABOS) admits that people who are unsuitable get
put on Workfare.
To counter the threat of people being put on
Workfare, we have developed the Solidarity Network (SN), which can draw upon
200-300 people in the city willing to give support.
Recently a claimant was asked to turn up at the
Stockbridge Hospice of Hope. About 10 people from SN went along in support. The
management had been told that those being directed to work were all volunteers.
When confronted by the people from the SN, the manager agreed to pull out of
the system. He also said that he would ensure that the authorities were told
that it had been his decision not to take on the claimant. We have the support
of Learn Direct, which represents genuine volunteers.
Adam (present at the meeting) is another person
we have represented at 4 different levels of the Workfare procedure.
The Department of Work and Pensions do have
courses to provide help, financed from the Flexible Support Fund. However, they
do not advertise this. The SN is able to provide real help through its
knowledge of the system.
What we are trying to develop is a counter-power
to make Workfare unworkable. This was achieved with the Anti-Poll Tax Campaign.
We also have links with other groups in the UK.
These include Boycott Austerity, Action Against Austerity, Dundee Against
Welfare Sanctions, Perth Against Welfare Sanctions, Castlemilk Against
Austerity, IWW and the Anarchist Federation.
We saw the 'Yes' vote in last year's referendum
as a vote for fairer society. However, we don't believe you can rely on the
state. There are many other issues that will bring people up against Holyrood,
e.g. fracking and open cast coal mining.
In Edinburgh the council is run by a Labour-SNP
coalition. They have been involved in a continued offensive against the
cleansing workers. We have been involved in blockades against scab lorries.
Dundee Against Welfare Sanctions was prominent in the campaign in support of
the Ninewells Hospital Porters.
One problem has been trying to link up with the
workers employed in the Jobs Centres. The last useful contact we had was Bill
Scott. A major job is to try and link workers and benefits claimants in the
face of the huge offensive to divide the working class. There is a link between
the employers' workplace offensive, and the attacks on housing and on
disability benefits.
One important case is the upcoming case against
Tony Cox. He was representing a particularly vulnerable woman on Arbroath. Job
Centre officials called the police, and although Tony was no longer in the
office when the police arrived, he was still arrested. He comes up for trial in
the Sheriff Court in Forfar on 13th October. There will be activity at Job
Centres on October12th in support of the right of advocacy.
Kate said she had been involved in the struggle for justice since 1992. People
had been driven to despair by Thatcher. The City of London had wanted mass
unemployment to promote a divide between the employed and unemployed. This
divide was economic, social and psychological.
In the move from an industrial to a service
economy, many people became "surplus to market requirements". Blair
and Cameron have continued Thatcher's war and stepped up the propaganda
offensive. The charities, which have been increasingly left to deal with the social
consequences, do not recognise this offensive.
In Drumchapel women are being denied welfare
rights. People dying of cancer, who are deemed to have more than 6 months to
live, are being denied benefits. Many young people are increasingly accepting
individual responsibility for socially created problems. They are being
demonised, driving some to suicide.
Kate had been to Nicaragua in the past and learned
from the women there that people who do not understand their history or present
can not make their future.
Jane asked how much support there was from the voluntary sector.
Mike answered saying that there was support form the Scottish Council of
Voluntary Organisations, Shelter, Oxfam, and Church Aid. They all wanted to
keep the voluntary sector voluntary.
However companies like Poundland and Asda resort
to Workfare labour.
Stewart said it was a heartbreaking situation. The growth of food banks shows
there is now mass hunger. Workfare is designed to undermine the bargaining
power of labour. The problem is that people have internalised capitalist
values.
Willie said that he had leaned from the Occupy movement. He had been involved in
occupations of charities. However, he felt frustrated by the lack of action on
a mass scale. Who will be the agent of real change? How do we involved wider
layers of people?
More people are now anti-austerity. The
political terrain is changing. This is reflected in the Corbyn campaign and the
election of 56 SNP MPs. It is reflected in RIC and now the Scottish Left
Project. We need political action as well as direct action.
Bob said that we need to reach out to union members, especially the workers in
the benefits offices. An injury to one is an injury to all. However, to do this
meant that members had to reclaim their unions and broaden their vision.
Kathy said that people were believing all the propaganda and had begun to
internalise this. As a consequence people who had to claim benefits for the
first time were really shocked.
Pat said that a lot of work needs to be done to deal with all the hype. The
papers and the government are out to demonise the poor.
However, Pat's experience during the referendum
campaign was that people began to see others' situations and think differently.
People understood that the problem lay in the lack of power.
Luke said that Labour were part of the problem. Three of the current leadership
candidates voted for Ian Duncan Smith's welfare cuts. Even the tax credits
brought in under Brown were just subsidies for the employers. Will Corbyn organise
extra-parliamentary action? Only this could be successful in resisting
austerity.
Izy said that the use of language was important. We shouldn't describe people
as claimants but as unemployed or disabled.
Mike said that people are increasingly judged by the job they do, not by any
other contributions they make to society.
We need a society which can guarantee shelter,
food, heating and transport for all. Our aim is not to get everybody into
employment. Being employed is being exploited.
Back in the 1970'sMike Cooley and the Lucas Shop
Stewards, when their factory was threatened with closure, produced a plan of
socially useful production.
The Edinburgh Campaign Against Poverty was
involved in direct action. But this is not all. We must relate to post-'Yes'
campaign situation.
Campaigning can be successful. This was shown by
the Anti-Poll Tax Campaign. There were over 30 local groups in Edinburgh. The
poll tax was defeated. The Scottish government was forced to back down over the
Bedroom Tax and provide funding.
In Spain there is a mass movement to resist
evictions. Other countries such as Italy and France had a better record of
workplace activity. The Edinburgh cleansing workers had had to fight against
their unions as well as the city authorities.
Mike saw electoral work as a dead end. It is
difficult to organise autonomously. He
had visited the Zapatistas in Mexico, where people had taken over the land and
were running their own communities.
Mike said that he was prepared to work alongside
those who held different political ideas, so he welcomed the invitation form
RIC to speak to the meeting..
No comments:
Post a Comment