Speakers - Pete
Cannell (RISE), George Kerevan (former SNP MP), Hillary Horrocks (ETUC), Lynn
McCabe (Community Education Worker and Women from the North Edinburgh Stop
Evictions campaign), Peter McColl (Scottish Greens) Holly Rigby (London
Momentum), Rory Scothorne (Roch Winds Collective, Scottish Labour Young
Socialists), Jonathon Shafi (RIC)
Facilitator-
Eileen Cook (RIC-Edinburgh and Scottish CND)
George Kerevan
George said it was wonderful to have been let out of the
Westminster prison. Your day extended from 7.00 - 23.00, with 8 and a half
hours of parliamentary cretinism.
Snap elections are meant to solve temporary crises. However
a serious crisis has been created by this election. The British ruling class
can not proceed with Brexit. Hammond represents British finance capital; Davis,
though, has the backing of The Economist.
This crisis, which has three aspects, can not be resolved in parliamentary
terms. Politics will take to the streets.
The first crisis is British capitalism doesn't know where to
go. Its one time global dominance was ended by the colonial revolutions and the
rise of US capital. Its response was to turn to the EEC. This failed because
German industrial capital was more productive. Despite initially opposing EEC
membership, it was the City of London which came out well, maintaining and
extending itself as the dominant wing of finance capital in Europe. The
collapse of British industry has turned what's left against the EU. The anti-EU
forces have also attracted hedge fund holders. May was chosen as Tory leader to
balance these two forces.
The second crisis is that of austerity. There has been a
massive increase in work exploitation. The 'Yes' campaign drew much of its
strength from those opposing austerity. Now that opposition has been channelled
into the Corbyn movement and Momentum.
A further feature of the opposition to austerity can be
found in the EU, in the aftermath of the EU treatment of southern Europe,
particularly Greece. The biggest challenge at present is the forthcoming
Catalan referendum. And we need a European perspective to prevent a second Cold
War.
The third crisis focuses on the SNP. Although we did well in
the May Local Council elections, we suffered a setback in the Westminster
elections. It misjudged things in calling for a second referendum. The
Conservatives used this. Labour joined them, and in Scotland the Labour
leadership is firmly in the Right. Neither did it see the Corbyn movement
coming. The SNP leadership has divorced itself from the Yes campaign, and its
Holyrood leaders have moved Right.
The time has come for extra-parliamentary protests if we are
to regain the initiative.
Rory Scothorne
My research concerns the
following areas, and I'm defining the 'radical left' as a broad but distinctive
tradition of critical 'practices', encompassing intellectual and practical
activities that reject or subvert the legitimacy of existing political, social,
cultural and economic systems, and which are bound together by shared
historical precedents.
1. The invention of 'radical Scotland': the Scottish
counter-public sphere and the idea of a Scottish radical left tradition
(periodicals like Crann-Tàra, groups like the John MacLean society
etc)
2. Radical left attitudes to race, nation and imperialism in
Scotland, 1962-2003: from Polaris on Holy Loch to the anti-Iraq war demo in
Glasgow.
3. Gender, sexuality and the nation: how did the radical left
navigate issues of women's and gay liberation in a distinctly Scottish context?
4. Nationalising class: how the Scottish radical left moved
between the identities of nation and class, often blurring the line between the
two
5. Ecology and localism: how new ideas about nature, democracy,
subsidiarity of power and community shaped the attitudes of some on the radical
left towards Scottish nationalism (e.g. why have Scottish environmentalist movements
been so comfortable with independence and how have they articulated
this?)
Off the top of your head,
are there any particular publications, individuals, organisations or events
that you think could be relevant to the subject? I'm also constructing a sort
of mini-archive of old documents, books and periodicals, so if there's anything
relevant in your possession that you'd be happy to part with - or even that I
could borrow and scan - I'd be really grateful for your help.
I want to say three things:
first, that the left wing of Scottish Labour is gaining in strength and
support, and should not be written off as a force for socialist politics.
Second, that it’s more important and more possible than ever to think beyond the divisions of the independence campaign and a Yes/No approach to the constitution.
And thirdly that while we may not agree on what electoral or parliamentary strategies socialists should take, we have to find ways of working together in the most important area of politics, which as you all know lies outside of parliament and elections.
First, Scottish Labour.
We should have done much better in the election. Kezia Dugdale ran a campaign designed to shore up Ian Murray’s vote in the affluent, deeply unionist People’s Republic of Edinburgh South and maybe win a seat for Blair McDougall. This failed by at least half.
Instead we picked up seats all over the central belt, in post-industrial areas where it was Corbyn’s message - far more than the unionist vote - that was crucial.
The left wing of the Scottish Labour is growing in strength within the party: we are winning more and more delegates to the party executive, we’ve got every single seat on the Scottish Young Labour executive, and thanks to our influence on the candidate selection committee we endorsed almost 20 of Labour’s 59 candidates in the election, 3 of whom won seats and many of whom came a close second.
If the Scottish Labour left were viewed as a socialist party in our own right, that would have counted as a major gain for the left in Scotland. And yet this achievement was ignored due to the hostility with which Scottish Labour are viewed. So I think it’s time to start thinking seriously about how to work with and assist left-wingers within Scottish Labour, regardless of any differences we might have over independence.
That brings us to my second point: yes, the Scottish Labour left has traditionally been opposed to independence - Corbyn, or someone else from the Labour left, now seems to have a good chance of winning a UK election and we want to contribute as much as we can to fighting for socialism across the UK on those grounds.
It also seems increasingly unfeasible that independence would “end Tory rule”, given the continuing Tory advance in Scottish elections.
And if we really want to seize control of the wealth that the ruling class has taken from us, there’ll be a whole lot more of it to go around if we get it from London rather than just Edinburgh.
But unlike the Scottish Labour leadership we’re happy to have that debate.
I voted Yes, as did many of my comrades in Scottish Labour Young Socialists, and we’ve recently formally agreed to ask RIC and other parts of the pro-independence left if they’ll co-operate on public debates in good faith about constitutional change and the national question - if you’ll have us.
We’re certainly not for the status quo: we support a programme of socialist federalism, bringing real public investment and job-creation powers to parliaments and assemblies across the country.
The Labour left across the UK is thinking very seriously about broader constitutional change, particularly proportional representation, a properly elected second chamber, and perhaps even a written constitution.
If indyref is going to be “parked” for some time, then we should see this as a renewed opportunity to work together on fighting that clear common enemy, the British political and economic establishment.
And of course, while we’ve lost recent internal battles, we’ll continue to fight to get Trident not just out of Scotland but shut down altogether and forever.
Those continuing internal battles should not be dismissed. Corbyn has proven that UK Labour is not some reactionary monolith, as so many people believed. The left has started winning fights within the party that we’ve been losing for decades, thanks in large part to the new support of the trade unions, who have historically sided with the right against the radical left of the party.
Those are the same trade unions that still hold power in the Scottish party, and the Scottish Labour left can draw on their support to make further gains within the Scottish party.
But it’s not just through the party or in parliament that our power exists: we need to build a much broader base than that if we’re to get anywhere close to socialism.
As John McDonnell says, we have to be out on the streets, overwhelming the government through sheer weight of protest; and as Corbyn recently implied after the Grenfell fire, we should be taking matters of socialist policy into our own hands, seizing the properties of the rich and putting them to good, social use.
But we can only do that if we’re more clear-sighted, unified and strategically minded than ever before, which requires compromises on both sides and an unprecedented degree of understanding.
So to my final point: where in Scotland can the Labour left and the pro-independence left find common cause?
We’re frozen for a moment at what seems at first glance to be a crossroads for the radical left in Scotland.
One road leads us through the Scottish Parliament, focusing on pulling the SNP left and trying to get another referendum; the other leads through Westminster, trying to turn the British state to socialist ends.
Experience shows that neither of these is good enough - both roads are built by and for the ruling class.
So with the finest traditions of Scottish radicalism in mind, I say that the roads might be theirs but the land belongs to us.
Let’s stray from parliamentary paths and go find common ground on that wild, radical terrain between them.
Forget Holyrood: Let’s occupy Trump’s golf course and RBS HQ.
Forget Westminster: Let’s picket Charlotte Street Partners, the favoured lobbyists of the Scottish elite.
Forget referendums: Let’s set up socialist education camps in the backyard of the British aristocracy, filling their old estates with radical culture and education.
If we can co-operate on anything, it is to make extra-parliamentary action the driving force of political change in Scotland and beyond. If we can make a success of even some of that then it’ll prove, once and for all, that we are indeed better together.
Second, that it’s more important and more possible than ever to think beyond the divisions of the independence campaign and a Yes/No approach to the constitution.
And thirdly that while we may not agree on what electoral or parliamentary strategies socialists should take, we have to find ways of working together in the most important area of politics, which as you all know lies outside of parliament and elections.
First, Scottish Labour.
We should have done much better in the election. Kezia Dugdale ran a campaign designed to shore up Ian Murray’s vote in the affluent, deeply unionist People’s Republic of Edinburgh South and maybe win a seat for Blair McDougall. This failed by at least half.
Instead we picked up seats all over the central belt, in post-industrial areas where it was Corbyn’s message - far more than the unionist vote - that was crucial.
The left wing of the Scottish Labour is growing in strength within the party: we are winning more and more delegates to the party executive, we’ve got every single seat on the Scottish Young Labour executive, and thanks to our influence on the candidate selection committee we endorsed almost 20 of Labour’s 59 candidates in the election, 3 of whom won seats and many of whom came a close second.
If the Scottish Labour left were viewed as a socialist party in our own right, that would have counted as a major gain for the left in Scotland. And yet this achievement was ignored due to the hostility with which Scottish Labour are viewed. So I think it’s time to start thinking seriously about how to work with and assist left-wingers within Scottish Labour, regardless of any differences we might have over independence.
That brings us to my second point: yes, the Scottish Labour left has traditionally been opposed to independence - Corbyn, or someone else from the Labour left, now seems to have a good chance of winning a UK election and we want to contribute as much as we can to fighting for socialism across the UK on those grounds.
It also seems increasingly unfeasible that independence would “end Tory rule”, given the continuing Tory advance in Scottish elections.
And if we really want to seize control of the wealth that the ruling class has taken from us, there’ll be a whole lot more of it to go around if we get it from London rather than just Edinburgh.
But unlike the Scottish Labour leadership we’re happy to have that debate.
I voted Yes, as did many of my comrades in Scottish Labour Young Socialists, and we’ve recently formally agreed to ask RIC and other parts of the pro-independence left if they’ll co-operate on public debates in good faith about constitutional change and the national question - if you’ll have us.
We’re certainly not for the status quo: we support a programme of socialist federalism, bringing real public investment and job-creation powers to parliaments and assemblies across the country.
The Labour left across the UK is thinking very seriously about broader constitutional change, particularly proportional representation, a properly elected second chamber, and perhaps even a written constitution.
If indyref is going to be “parked” for some time, then we should see this as a renewed opportunity to work together on fighting that clear common enemy, the British political and economic establishment.
And of course, while we’ve lost recent internal battles, we’ll continue to fight to get Trident not just out of Scotland but shut down altogether and forever.
Those continuing internal battles should not be dismissed. Corbyn has proven that UK Labour is not some reactionary monolith, as so many people believed. The left has started winning fights within the party that we’ve been losing for decades, thanks in large part to the new support of the trade unions, who have historically sided with the right against the radical left of the party.
Those are the same trade unions that still hold power in the Scottish party, and the Scottish Labour left can draw on their support to make further gains within the Scottish party.
But it’s not just through the party or in parliament that our power exists: we need to build a much broader base than that if we’re to get anywhere close to socialism.
As John McDonnell says, we have to be out on the streets, overwhelming the government through sheer weight of protest; and as Corbyn recently implied after the Grenfell fire, we should be taking matters of socialist policy into our own hands, seizing the properties of the rich and putting them to good, social use.
But we can only do that if we’re more clear-sighted, unified and strategically minded than ever before, which requires compromises on both sides and an unprecedented degree of understanding.
So to my final point: where in Scotland can the Labour left and the pro-independence left find common cause?
We’re frozen for a moment at what seems at first glance to be a crossroads for the radical left in Scotland.
One road leads us through the Scottish Parliament, focusing on pulling the SNP left and trying to get another referendum; the other leads through Westminster, trying to turn the British state to socialist ends.
Experience shows that neither of these is good enough - both roads are built by and for the ruling class.
So with the finest traditions of Scottish radicalism in mind, I say that the roads might be theirs but the land belongs to us.
Let’s stray from parliamentary paths and go find common ground on that wild, radical terrain between them.
Forget Holyrood: Let’s occupy Trump’s golf course and RBS HQ.
Forget Westminster: Let’s picket Charlotte Street Partners, the favoured lobbyists of the Scottish elite.
Forget referendums: Let’s set up socialist education camps in the backyard of the British aristocracy, filling their old estates with radical culture and education.
If we can co-operate on anything, it is to make extra-parliamentary action the driving force of political change in Scotland and beyond. If we can make a success of even some of that then it’ll prove, once and for all, that we are indeed better together.
Hilary Horrocks
The ETUC is one of several local TUCs in Scotland. It forms
a committee of delegates from local trade unions. Hilary is an NUJ delegate.
The Grenfell Tower tragedy expresses even more than the
election result the state of politics and class relations in Britain today. We
have heard with horror the details of this disaster waiting to happen, because
of the wholesale privatisation and deregulation that accompanied neoliberalism,
starting from Thatcher but continued enthusiastically by the Blair and Brown
governments. Cuts to council spending have meant that projects have been handed
to private companies whose sole motive is profit, who don’t have to explain
themselves to anyone, who can’t be unelected, and whose work is not adequately
supervised due to the decimation of government inspectors. But the shoddy
social housing that’s resulted has been good enough for working-class people
and immigrants.
In Glasgow in the late 1970s tenants in the Gorbals tower blocks were made ill by the dampness in their flats. For years, the Labour council blamed the condensation on the tenants’ ‘lifestyle’. They only admitted much later that the building units had been designed for Algeria and so had no insulation that could cope with the Glasgow climate. And the death of a schoolgirl, crushed by a falling wall at Liberton High in 2014, resulted from the cutting-corners methods of the contractors employed by Edinburgh council under PFI. The company concerned will escape prosecution on the technicality that she was a pupil and not an employee. Although Edinburgh council has never used flammable cladding, there are 4,000 high-rise homes in the city with no sprinkler systems. The TUC will back demands that ALL blocks are fitted with sprinklers and that other lessons from the Grenfell fire are urgently applied.
But the class contempt that led to the Grenfell tragedy is endemic in the political system of capitalism. The fire has demonstrated this to more people than ever before and has given rise to a big and angry social movement - the kind of movement that found expression in the Yes campaign, in the general election with Corbyn, and in hundreds of local campaigns against austerity. I think our stress should be on supporting these movements, rather than focussing on electoral tactics. Edinburgh trade union council tries to do this, linking local unions and resistance in the community, supporting industrial action, campaigns against council cuts and against precarious work, the thousands of EU workers here, and local support for refugees. We want to provide a platform for local resistance to discuss the new political situation, in a conference this autumn.
Pete Cannell
RISE is a new political organisation of socialists, still
with relatively few members.
RISE didn't stand candidates in the recent general election,
but the issues that needed addressed were clear - opposing racism, climate
change and austerity. Corbyn's Labour Manifesto only addressed the last of
these.
We have to look to the international movements for the real
engines of change over the last 15 years. There were the Social Forums in the
early 2000s, Stop the War, Occupy and then the Yes campaign. The last night
before the referendum vote, RIC organised a vibrant international rally on the
Meadows.
The Yes campaign led to widespread democratic debate. The
campaign was taken to the working class housing schemes. All his activity had
an extra-parliamentary focus.
RISE grew out of RIC. It has raised the issue of how
political parties relate to social movements.
This means recognising the reality that new movements will
involve SNP, Labour, Green, SSP and RISE members. If we were all in one
political organisation then we wouldn't need to be here.
Looking to the recent general election, voting levels were quite
a bit lower than in Indyref1. Since then most people's conditions have become
worse.
We do need the debate Rory suggested. In this we need to
look at the real nature of the UK state and a British nationalism which
supports imperialism and the big arms companies.
Lynn McCabe
Lynn explained that the young
women involved in the campaign to stop families being evicted because of the
benefit cap were unable to attend the meeting tonight due to childcare
difficulties. Lynn is a community worker in North Edinburgh and has been
helping to support the campaign, however, she was speaking tonight in a
personal capacity.
The campaign has identified 11
families with 42 children facing eviction from privately rented homes in North
Edinburgh due to the Benefits Cap. Some have already been evicted and
have been forced to live in appalling B & B's and hostels. The
situation has been made worse due to the families being moved outwith
their local community where they have support networks. They are
also having to travel long distances to get children to and from school.
When the families have been evicted from their homes, they must present as
homeless and basically can only take what they can carry. Their
belongings are collected on the day of their eviction and put into storage
until they are allocated permanent accommodation (currently between 12 - 18
months). It costs £60 to access items from the storage containers.
The women have never been involved
in a campaign before but felt they had no choice as their backs were
against the wall. They have been supported by local activists from North Edinburgh
and across the city. Their immediate demand is for Edinburgh Council to pay
full DHP to completely cover rent to prevent any more families from losing
their homes. They are also demanding an end to families being
allocated Bed and Breakfast accommodation and asking for families to
be housed in flats which meet acceptable standards in suitable areas as close
to their former homes as possible. In the longer term they want the
council to build more social housing, which would help to address the current
housing crisis.
The campaign is also directed
at the Scottish Government and Westminster. They want the Scottish
Parliament to allocate sufficient funds to local authorities to cover DHP,
as they were forced to do over the Bedroom Tax and they want Westminster to
scrap the benefit cap.
To date, the women have lobbied
local politicians, occupied their local housing office, held a
demonstration in the city chambers, protested outside Ruth Davidson's
constituency office and are planning a deputation at the Council Chambers on
Thursday 29th June. They are looking for support from activists from across
the city as they know that this issue is not confined to North Edinburgh.
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/politics/video-campaigners-stage-protest-in-ruth-davidson-s-office-1-4469283/amp
Peter McColl
"The old is dying and the new s struggling to be
born". This quote from Antonio Gramsci describes the situation we face
today.
The capitalist system is crisis ridden. The very rhetoric of
the Right highlights this crisis. Much of this has to do with the promotion of
market forces into social provision and the use of Arms Length Management
Organisations (ALMOs) to avoid any social responsibility.
Our response to this should be democratic control and
self-management. This is especially the case in Housing, Health and Education. The
consequences of failing to do this have been highlighted by the Grenfell Flats
tragedy .
In the recent Euro-referendum Peter voted to Remain. The Leave
victory has contributed to pushing international politics to the Right, and
this has been shown by Trump's election victory. However, recent developments in
the Labour Party and Portuguese Socialist Party have shown there can be a fight
back against the old order. In Portugal the PSP has gone into a coalition with
the Greens, the Communists and the Left Bloc.
What we need is an Energy Campaign. Trump got backing from
the big oil and gas companies intent on squeezing these fuels from the ground.
There is a huge threat to the environment in continued dependence on
carbon-based fuels. Escalating climate change is a powerful indicator of the
future we face if this isn't challenged successfully before a tipping point is
reached. The mass movement of desperate people will greatly increase.
We also face the growing problem of automation. Go to any
supermarket today and you can see how till operators have been replaced by
machines. The best response to this is a Citizens Income. The current Universal
Credit system is in meltdown.
We are living in 'a time of monsters'. We have seen the Tea
Party and Trump, Brexit and May. Even the Centre has to reinvent itself as
against the establishment as the victory of Macron in France has shown. This
though is unlikely to last.
Grenfell Tower could be a signal for wider social unrest. We
live in dangerous but exciting times.
Jonathon Shafi
On the night of the election Jonathan was in a taxi being
driven by a Tory supporter. It was then that the results of the exit poll were
announced. Suddenly everything had changed. The TV switched its focus on to
Jeremy Corbyn and his many supporters. In contrast May seemed alone.
There are a lot of similarities between IndyRef1 in 2014 and
Corbyn's campaign in General Election. Both faced a weaponised propaganda offensive
from the media. In response a movement was created that surged into society,
and became wider than the political parties.
You might have thought that the terrorist attacks in
Manchester and London would have reinforced May and the Tories. Instead, Home
Secretary, Amber Rudd, responsible for the government response. nearly lost her
seat. This was because the people in these two cities were united in their own
response. Both Corbyn and McDonnell are supporters of extra-parliamentary
movements. In contrast, Nicola Sturgeon sees movements as threat to SNP
hegemony and tries to rein them in and control them. It was no accident that
the SNP organised its rally in November 2014 next door to the their RIC
Conference to try and divert people away form it.
We now have the prospect of Labour forming the Westminster
government, whilst the SNP forms the Holyrood government. Our response should
be to maximise our voice on the streets.
In Scotland, the recent election was focussed on the
constitutional dynamic. Now, after Grenfell, the wider crisis over austerity is
acute. The Right wing is frightened of people on the streets. Young people,
often written off as apolitical, are becoming politically educated. There is real class anger.
We should be aware of the lengths the British ruling class
is prepared to go. Tommy Robinson, ex-leader of the EDL, may appear marginal,
but he is being cultivated behind the scenes at present, in case he should be
necessary. Racism is the weapon being used to bludgeon class unity.
The SNP is nothing like radical enough. It has reneged on
several electoral promises. It didn't even scrap the Council Tax. Occupying the
political ground that the Labour Right had abandoned is no longer enough with
the rise of Corbyn.
RIC should support the 'Not One More Day More' demo on July
1st in London. This provides an immediate focus of focus of all the
contradictions the Tories currently face.
Questions and Contributions
Murdo asked if it
had not been a mistake for the SNP government to link IndyRef 2 with continued
membership of the EU. He also said that any political organisation must have
the aim of forming a government and that movements were not enough.
Willie argued
that the immediate focus should not be on another election to Westminster but
on getting on to the streets. We also need to bridge the gap between community
campaigning and the fight of council workers on wages and conditions. We needed
to take an inclusive class view which united workers as service providers and
service users. It was not good enough when in return for some monetary
compensation or alternative job, trade unions accepted closures which
devastated the communities.
Ian argue that
the time had come for the LEFT to abandon Scottish nationalism and go for the
British road which offered wider working class unity and access to greater
resources.
Rory said that
socialists should be emphasising the value of everyday expertise and should
champion new forms of cooperation. Yes, we would eventually have to confront
the state with its police and soldiers, but we hadn't reached this stage yet.
Once we had won power, socialist parties should get out of the way.
George said that
we needed a unifying political project and that should be the fight against
Austerity. Yes, we needed people on the streets both outside Westminster and
Holyrood.
He did not demand that Labour support Scottish independence,
but that it recognised the democratic right of Scotland to hold an independence
referendum.
He said that he did not recognise Jonathon's
characterisation of the SNP as hostile to the Left. Many of its leadership had
come out of opposition to the Poll Tax and Trident or from the left wing 79
Group.
Donny said that
the SDL was mounting a demonstration in Edinburgh this Sunday. With UKIP's
collapse, politics was further polarising and fascists were re-emerging.
The counter demo meets at 13.00 at Market Street.
Duncan said that
the SNP, Labour, Lib-Dems and Tories all vote for cuts on the Edinburgh
Council. We need to organise an opposition prepared to challenge all these
parties in the run-up to next February's Council budget proposals.
? said that we
face the prospect of another 5 years of Tory government. Should we be
campaigning for Corbyn or not?
Peter said that
we should be democratising everything staring with the political parties. We
needed to reverse the pressure coming from Westminster, then Holyrood on to the
Local Councils. This means getting the councils to defy the cuts.
George said that many
councillors had been suspended from office in Catalunya for defying Madrid.
___________
The meeting finished
off with a contribution from Holly Rigby (Momentum) on the new political
situation in London.
Back in 2012 Holly was so inspired by the Yes campaign that
she moved up to Glasgow, and joined RIC after its first conference. Since the
end of IndyRef1 Holly has moved back to London. But now with the Cobyn
campaign, England too has experienced its IndyRef1.
On election night it was good to see May crestfallen, Nick
Clegg ousted and Chuka Umunna eat humblepie.
After the Grenfell Towers London is currently in the process
of grieving. The Council wont release the details of those killed. It is trying
to manage anger to prevent it breaking out.
It wasn't the local politicians and officers who came to the
aid of the Grenfell residents. Local Muslim women provided sparkly gift bags.
Jeremy Corbyn put his arms around the casualties. Theresa May was chased out of
the local church.
Labour MP, Clive Lewis has said, "Burn neo-liberalism,
not people." This is not a white or a black issue, but a class issue.
However, there is an earlier history to this. There was the
Take Back the City movement. The Corbyn movement represents the culmination of
years of activity.
In 2011, the police killing of Mark Duggan led to 2 days of
riots in Tottenham. Riots are the voice of the voiceless. Today, with the Corbyn
movement giving people a voice, there have been no riots but there have been
lots of demonstrations.
Holly's own involvement began in Croydon, where she joined
Momentum and campaigned for Sarah Jones against the sitting Tory Housing
Minister, Gary Barwell.
(having lost his seat, he has now become May's Chief of
Staff!). The local campaign used the method of mass registration and
campaigning that RIC had used in IndyRef1. This was the seat that Jeremy Corbyn
launched his campaign in.
The Manifesto was inspirational, particularly the £10
minimum wage and the ending of tuition fees. There have been star-studded
rallies around the country, the biggest being the 20,000 who attended the
Liverpool rally. No longer can young people be accused of being apathetic.
Momentum is part of the same wave of protest that led to RIC
in Scotland and Bernie Sanders in the USA. May is now seen as weak and wobbly
and even a potential threat to the state's interests, with her coalition of
chaos with terrorists.
Sometimes "there decades when nothing happens, and
there are weeks when decades happen". That is what we are now living
through.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment