Monday, 16 April 2018

CLIMATE CHANGE


Meeting held on Wednesday, 28th March

Speakers - Sarah Beattie-Smith, World Wildlife Fund, Scotland
                    Caroline Rance, Friends of the Earth, Scotland

Facilitator - Stephen McMurray

Climate Change

What is it, what causes it and what effects is it having now & likely to have?
How has Scotland been doing in tackling climate change?
Scotland’s new Climate Change Bill – what is it & what needs to change?
What does climate action look like around the world?

•      What is it? (and what is it not…?)
•      What drives it?
•      What effects is it having?
•      What effects could it have in future?

 What drives climate change?

Transport- 27.3%
Energy supply - 25.4%
Agriculture - 22.5%
Business and Industry - 17.9%
Homes - 12.7%
Development - 3.5%
Public Sector - 2.3%
Waste - 2.9%

What effects is it having?

1.            Half of the world’s species in our most precious eco systems face   extinction because of climate change, according to new research from WWF
  
2.      Climate change is driving human migration around the world, with countries. Recent research suggests that as many as one billion people may be climate refugees by 2050 (see https://reliefweb.int/report/world/climate-migrants-might-reach-         one-billion-2050)

3.      Within wealthy nations such as the UK and USA, climate change is     also having a significant effect. For example, in 2017 the United    States experienced 16 separate extreme weather events which cost     the economy over $1bn each time (see          https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/beyond-data/2017-us-billion-dollar-weather-and-climate-disasters-historic-year)


What effects could it have in the future?

Climate change will continue to have severe and adverse impacts on people, wildlife and the wider environment. The level of severity of climate change’s impacts depends on the action we take in the next few years and the extent to which we limit global temperature increases.

The Paris Climate Agreement requires countries to take action to limit global temperature increases to 2 degrees Celsius, compared with pre-industrial times, and to pursue efforts to limit global temperature increases to 1.5 degrees.

The difference between these two temperature increases may seem small, but by limiting temperature increases to 1.5 degrees, we significantly increase the chances of protecting people, wildlife and the environment from the worst impacts of a changing climate. 

For example


If global temperature increases reach 2 degrees, there’s a 99% chance that all coral reefs will die. Under a 1.5 degree scenario, that chance falls to 70%. Given that a quarter of all marine life on earth and 1 billion people depend on our coral reefs for their survival, it’s imperative that we limit warming to 1.5 degrees.


Under a 2 degree scenario, species and habitat loss will be 50% greater than under a 1.5 degree scenario, including in some of the most sensitive places on the planet such as the Arctic.

-    If global temperature increases reach 2 degrees, there’s a 99% chance that all coral reefs will die. Under a 1.5 degree scenario, that chance falls to 70%. Given that a quarter of all marine life on earth and 1 billion people depend on our coral reefs for their survival, it’s imperative that we limit warming to 1.5 degrees.


How is Scotland doing?

From 1990 to 2015

The energy sector has reduced its harmful impact (although there’s still a long way to go) and demonstrates that transport and agriculture have barely reduced their emissions over the last 25 years.

It’s worth noting that whilst progress has been made in insulating Scotland’s homes and using less energy in the process, the majority of our homes still fall below the standard recommended for our health, and are leaking precious energy in the process. 
The poor energy efficiency of many of our homes means that our energy use and therefore our emissions go up during cold winters, as see in the chart above.

Some great things

•      41% emissions reduction
•      50%+ electricity from renewables
•      50% renewables target for all energy by 2030
•      More community owned managed energy


Scotland has achieved some fantastic things for the planet and we continue to make great strides towards a low carbon future. For example, the 2009 Climate Change Act set a target for reducing emissions by 42% by 2020, compared with 1990 levels and we’ve already got to 41%. At the time, no one was certain how that target would be achieved, but we’re on track to smash it.

We now get more than half our electricity from renewable sources and the Scottish Government has set a target of getting half of all our energy (across heat, transport and electricity) from renewables by 2030.

But...

Scotland is still locked into the oil and gas industry. Political support for the industry is strong, particularly amongst the SNP, but also with the Conservatives and Labour. 

However all the science is clear – we simply cannot afford to keep using oil and gas if we are to tackle climate change. Indeed, we need to leave 80% of the oil and gas that we’ve already discovered, underground, nevermind searching for more.

Yet we still subsidise the oil and gas industry and support them to search for new fossil fuel deposits. In 2015, Norway got £17bn from the oil and gas industry in taxes. In the UK, we got just £222m because of our lax approach to taxation and our subsidies for the industry.

The UK Government gaveShell £80m in tax rebates in 2015 whilst they cut 13,000 jobs & paid shareholders £7.9bn. Meanwhile in Norway, Shell paid the Govt £2.7bn.

What do we want?

So – how do we change this reliance on fossil fuels and move to a world where we avoid the worst impacts of climate change?
The Scottish Government has committed to introducing a new climate change bill before the end of June 2018, with the bill expected to become law within a year. The SNP’s 2016 manifesto promised that this bill would implement the Paris Agreement, meaning it needs to set targets in line with keeping temperature increases below 2 degrees and pursuing efforts to keep them below 1.5 degrees.

WWF Scotland and Friends of the Earth Scotland are members of Stop Climate Chaos Scotland – a coalition of over 50 organisations representing at least 1.5 million people.

We’re campaigning for a strong new climate change bill which helps to limit global temperature increases to 1.5 degrees.

Scottish Government

66% reduction by 2030
90% reduction by 2050
No new policy action

Stop Climate Change Scotland

77% reduction by 2030
100% reduction by 2050
New policy action on;
1) Homes
2) Transport
3) Farming
Aligning budgets with climate targets

In a bit more detail

77% reduction by 2030
100% reduction by 2050 at the latest (this is also known as “net zero”)Aligning budgets with climate targets

1.    Homes (EPC C by 2025)
2.    Transport (phase out petrol & diesel by 2030)

New policy action on;
1.    Farming (manage nitrogen better)
2.    Just Transition Commission
3.    Intergenerational justice
4.    Consumption emissions
5.    20% of land organic by 2030
6.    Decarbonise energy
7.    Stop digging up peat
8.    Embed climate justice

The 77% target for 2030 is consistent with the idea of halving our emissions every decade (known as the “carbon law”) and it’s consistent with various equity models which assign a greater share of emissions reductions to countries which have historically been high emitters and which have the resources to decarbonise more quickly than other nations.

The 100% target, known as net zero, still assumes that there will be some greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, for example from farming. However, these would be balanced out by what’s known as “negative emissions”. This is where emissions are absorbed, either naturally via things like planting trees or protecting seabeds that absorb carbon, or through emerging technologies such as carbon capture and storage. 

Around the world, other countries are either setting or thinking about setting their own “net zero” targets. Sweden already has one – they aim to be net zero by 2045 – and other places from Catalonia to New Zealand and from Costa Rica to the Marshall Islands are either planning targets or already working towards meeting them. In Europe, the European Parliament has voted to set a net zero target for 2050.

Scotland has the chance to join this group of world leading nations and reassert its role as a global leader on climate change.

1.    Homes  - we’re calling for all homes across Scotland to be insulated and kitted out with sustainable heat so that they meet an energy performance certification (EPC) rating of at least C by 2025. We reckon that would save the best part of a million tonnes of carbon, lift hundreds of thousands of people out of fuel poverty and deliver tens of millions in savings for the NHS every year as well as creating thousands of jobs.
2.    Transport – we’ve been calling for the Government to phase out petrol & diesel cars and vans by 2030. In the 2017 Programme for Government they committed to doing this by 2032 and have announced plans to double the funding for walking and cycling infrastructure as well as various funds and programmes to support the roll out of electric vehicles.
3.    Farming – we want to see the Government start counting how much nitrogen is used, particularly in farming where it’s an important fertiliser. Nitrogen is much worse for climate change than carbon dioxide and it also pollutes our air and water. We’re just asking government to work out how much is used and where, so that in time, it can be better managed.
4.    Just Transition Commission – we want the climate change bill to set up a commission to oversee the transition from oil and gas to a low carbon economy, ensuring that this is done in a way that protects workers and doesn’t harm the poorest in society
5.    Intergenerational justice – we want young people to be part of the discussion with Government in how climate decisions are made, following the example of the Wellbeing of Future Generations Act in Wales.
6.    Consumption emissions – our emissions don’t just come from what we produce in Scotland, but from what we consume. That includes the food we consume from overseas as well as electrical goods and even fossil fuels from other countries. Looking at consumption emissions, Scotland’s footprint has actually gotten bigger over the last 20 years, despite great progress on domestic emissions. We want the Government to measure and report on consumption emissions each year and set targets to reduce them.
7.    20% of land organic by 2030 – we want a fifth of Scotland’s agricultural land to be organic by 2030, protecting our soils for future generations.
8.    Decarbonise energy – we started the campaign calling for a target of 50% of all our energy needs across heat, electricity and transport to be met from renewables by 2030. The Scottish Government has since committed to meeting this target.
9.    Stop digging up peat – our peatlands are great at absorbing carbon and helping in the fight against climate change, but when we dig up peat, and worse – when we burn it, it makes climate change worse. That means we need the Government to do more to protect Scottish peatlands and reduce the amount of peat we use from elsewhere.
10.Embed climate justice – We’re calling on Government to embed the principle of climate justice in the new bill. That means that the richest countries and those which have done most to cause climate change (including Scotland) are the ones which carry the biggest burden of responsibility in fighting it, whilst supporting those nations which are often worst affected but have done least to cause it.


What is to be done?

Around the world, people like us are fighting for greater action on climate change. Whether it’s fighting fracking in Scotland or protesting pipelines in America, calling for more ambitious action to protect nature in Brazil or taking big money out of fossil fuels around the world.

It’s activism like this, combined with a strong moral case for action and detailed credible science which have won some of the key battles in fighting climate change, and it’s only through more of this kind of combined action that we’ll really make a difference.

________

The presentation was followed by a break out into three groups where everybody participated in the discussion




RIC NATIONAL SPRING CONFERENCE, 10.3.18



This was first posted on bella caledonia at:-


The Radical Independence Campaign held its Spring Conference in Edinburgh on Saturday, 10th March. The conference was designed as one where the Left could take a strategic overview of the situation the Scottish Independence Movement is in. Over a hundred and twenty attended and the level of discussion was very good.

When IndyRef1 was launched in 2012 Yes campaigners were in the driving seat. The initiative had come from the Scottish government, and the UK government was constantly put on the back foot in the run-up to September 18th, 2014. Starting with 28%, support for independence rose to 45%. RIC was particularly pleased with the contribution we made to voter registration in the housing schemes long abandoned by the mainstream parties. The 85% voter participation was truly historic. The massive engagement of people throughout Scotland amounted to a ‘democratic revolution’. In some ways the defeat felt more like a victory for Yes campaigners, and more like a defeat for Cameron’s government. The SNP’s landslide victory in the 2015 general election seemed to underscore this.

Cameron’s next attempt to shore up the existing UK set-up was to concede another referendum, this time over continued EU membership. The outcome has made things far more uncertain. After losing to the Brexiteers, the UK government has lost all coherence. Their options for UK survival in an increasingly crisis-ridden world include a ‘cake and eat it’ deal with the EU, a free trade agreement with Trump and the former the White colonies (as advocated by CANZUK), and becoming an offshore finance and tax haven – a North Atlantic Singapore. These options range from the unlikely, through the highly damaging, to pure fantasy based on a nostalgic vision of Empire 2.
Compared with 2012-14, it is this situation of uncertainty that marks the situation the Scottish Independence Movement finds itself in. Although the Scottish Independence Convention’s Bridges to Indy event, held last November, was an impressive event and there is continued local campaigning going on, the Yes Movement no longer holds the initiative. We are having to react to a world dominated by events beyond out immediate control. Furthermore, the Tories, they are not in control of the wider situation their actions have contributed to. These include the rise of the unpredictable Trump and the populist and far right in Europe. Neither do they hold a strong hand in the negotiations with the EU. And beyond these, there is the prospect of growing confrontation with Putin’s Russia, whilst Trump wants to step up the pressure on China.

Two of the Conference sessions approached this situation from different perspectives. The first one directly dealt with Brexit. Maggie Chapman, co-convenor of the Scottish Greens, whilst criticising aspects of the EU, placed her emphasis on the move to the Right brought about by Brexit. This had led to mounting attacks on migrants, and the Tory government’s wish to remove what EU protections exist in order to open the UK up to free trade with the USA and China. In contrast, Neil Davidson of RS21 attacked the EU as a neo-liberal entity less democratic than the UK. He said that the EU set-up represented a realisation of von Hayek’s desire to have a democratically unaccountable body in overall control of the economy in order to eliminate political debate. He also feared that if Brexit was denied this would fuel the Far Right.

The second session examined the current state of the Scottish Independence Movement. We were pleased that David Jamieson of Commonspace was able to stand in at the last moment for Jonathon Shafi of RIC, who was unable to attend. David put a lot of emphasis on the wider political constraints we confront. A lot of Yes campaigners want IndyRef2 as soon as possible, but it is highly unlikely, even if the Scottish Parliament voted for one, that the current British government would concede one now.

The second speaker in this session, Lesley Riddoch, journalist and indefatigable campaigner, agreed that things were unpredictable, but this meant that a surprise opening for Scottish independence could arise at any time. She also went through the historical example of the Norwegian independence campaign, emphasising how important grassroots organising was. She pointed to the future meetings that were being organised at a local level.

RIC was aware of the controversial nature of the third session, which addressed the impact of the rise of Corbyn upon Scottish politics. Rory Scothorne, who was part of the Roch Winds Collective during IndyRef1, is now a member of the Labour Party, the Young Socialists and Momentum. Rory was not uncritical of the Labour Party, but said that it is no longer the party of Tony Blair, or that which signed up to Better Together. Many young people have joined and are active over issues on the ground, such as the Fair Rents and Living Wage campaigns. These also involve RIC members. He thought that these were areas where we could work together.

Tommy Sheppard, SNP MP for East Edinburgh, said that he welcomed the rise of Corbyn in England. He was also quite happy to work with Labour on specific issues. However, he criticised Richard Leonard’s tribalism and his attacks on the SNP government for not delivering reforms, which they did not have the powers to do, and which Labour had voted against. A debate needed to take place about the nature of the UK, and whether this provided an adequate framework for the sort of reforms we needed.

Cat Boyd, speaking for RIC, said that in many ways the rise of Corbyn in England was the political equivalent of the Yes movement in Scotland. It drew in similar people. However, the fact that so many had already been drawn into the Yes movement in Scotland limited the impact of Corbyn here. Although we shared many economic and social aims, Cat said that the strength of the Yes movement is that it provides a critique of the UK state, which Corbyn does not.

The last session looked to the international situation we face. George Kerevan SNP gave an account of the situation in Catalunya. He particularly emphasised the grassroots nature of the campaign. He also said that there had been some divergence between the social movements and the campaign to conduct the Catalan independence referendum, which tended to undermine their potential. Only the Popular Unity Candidacy emphasised the importance of this link. George also thought that the Catalan leaders should have been more prepared for the outcome, and not retreated to Brussels, in the naive belief they would get official EU support. He also pointed to the links and lessons to be drawn for Scotland. As in Spain, the current British government is very unlikely to concede an independence referendum.

We were pleased that Gerry Carroll, the People before Profit MLA at the currently suspended Stormont, was able to step in when Bernadette McAliskey was unable to attend. She sent her warm greetings. Gerry took us through the situation both North and South. PBP also has TDs in Dublin. Ireland has become a very changed place. Few people would have thought that Ireland (except for the North of course!) would have been the first place in these islands to vote for gay marriage. The campaign to abolish Clause 8 of the Irish constitution, which illegalises abortion, is now to the forefront of campaigning. Ireland is still suffering from the impact of the austerity measures imposed by the EU. Austerity is also a major issue in the North, which PBP has emphasised. The Irish language issue has proved to be a major issue leading to the suspension of Stormont. This underscored the narrow thinking behind the Unionist vision of who belonged.

The speakers and the RIC chairs, James Foley from Dumfries, Myshelle Haywood from Aberdeen, Stewart Fairweather from Dundee and Frances Curran from Glasgow, contributed to the open and friendly nature of the day. All those speaking from the floor entered into the spirit of the meeting.

There were practical outcomes too. RIC will be asking people to support the Hands Off Our Parliament – Hands Around Holyrood demonstration at the Scottish Parliament on Friday, March 23rd from 10am. This is being organised to protest at the UK government’s attempted seizure of already devolved powers following Brexit.

The Campaign for a European Republican Socialist Party had a stall, which called for the Scottish Parliament to hold a ratification referendum over the terms of the Tory Brexit, and not leave it in the hands of Theresa May or Westminster.

The Democratic Left had a stall promoting Neal Ascherson’s new pamphlet, Tom Nairn – ‘Painting Nationalism Red?’ Nairn has been a pivotal figure on the Left, both in relation to Scottish independence and the EU.

There were other stalls from the SSP, Pensioners for Independence and the Edinburgh Stop the War Coalition, whilst cards were given out to send to the Catalan political prisoners.
The conference was recorded by Independence Live and their full coverage can be seen at:-

For RIC thorough discussions and debate are vital to the activities of the movements for Scottish self-determination and social justice. Our members and supporters will be seen in all these campaigns. We don’t wait for a line handed down by leaders, but encourage all to take part, because that is the sort of Scotland we want to create. We remain Scottish internationalists arguing that Another Scotland Is Possible, Another Europe Is Possible, and Another World Is Possible.

Allan Armstrong
 -